The Supreme Court term this year ended with an explosion, as the right-wing bench handed down landmark cases rolling back affirmative action, slashing the Biden administration’s student debt forgiveness program and giving a big thumbs up to a potential wedding website designer’s desire not to serve hypothetical same-sex couples.
Already, the docket for next term is littered with cases that present existential threats to survivors of domestic violence, consumer protections and the administrative state.
United States v. Rahimi
The Supreme Court will hear a case concerning whether a federal gun ban for those under domestic violence orders
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America
At the urging of the Biden administration (though a term later than it asked for), the Court will hear a case that represents a fundamental threat to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the brainchild of now-Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) that was created in the aftermath of the 2008 financial collapse.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
As ever, the Supreme Court has tucked a nuclear bomb to explode the administrative state into its slate of cases.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo squarely invites the justices to overturn the Chevron doctrine, stemming from a 1984 case and holding that courts should defer to federal agencies’ interpretation of ambiguous statutes as long as that interpretation is reasonable.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
As ever, the Supreme Court has tucked a nuclear bomb to explode the administrative state into its slate of cases.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo squarely invites the justices to overturn the Chevron doctrine, stemming from a 1984 case and holding that courts should defer to federal agencies’ interpretation of ambiguous statutes as long as that interpretation is reasonable.
No comments:
Post a Comment