Showing posts with label repeal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label repeal. Show all posts

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Herald of Change? New Jersey's Repeal of the Death Penalty

My essay - which introduces the Proceedings of last year's symposium at Seton Hall on the repeal of the death penalty -has now been published by the Seton Hall Legislative Journal at 33 Seton Hall Leg. J. 21 (2008).

It is available on SSRN here. Abstract below.

The complete proceedings are available on SSRN here and via the post just below this one.

The symposium did what we sought - built the historical record and demonstrated how the change came to America. It was a powerful message, which I delivered several times in China in December 2008. I had the good fortune to be invited by NYU Law Prof. Jerome Cohen to join him, his staff Yu Ping and Margaret Lewis, along with judges Jed Rakoff (Southern District NY) and John M. Walker (2d Circuit). We spoke to judges, prosecutors, and students at universities in Guangzhou and Beijing. I went on to Wuhan to Huazhong University of Science & Technology. (More on that in a future post.)

Abstract
Herald of Change
In 2007, the New Jersey Legislature repealed the death penalty, twenty five years after it had reinstated capital punishment. The U.S. Supreme Court suspended all executions in 1972 in Furman v. Georgia. New Jersey restored the measure in 1982 - relying on specified aggravating and mitigating factors to cure the arbitrariness that the Supreme Court had declared made execution as random as being struck by lightning.

Of 228 death penalty trials 60 were sentenced to death, 57 death sentences were reversed on appeal. 9 condemned men remained on death row when the Legislature’s Study commission recommended repeal in 2007. No one was executed from reinstatement to the Legislature acted in December 2007, replacing execution with life imprisonment without parole.

The New Jersey courts took their mandate to avoid arbitrariness with utmost earnestness and approached their task with scientific rigor. The Office of the Public Defender, in its mission to "save lives" used advanced statistical methods to examine death penalty outcomes across a spectrum of circumstances. The appointed a Special Master to determine if racial or other impermissible disparity tainted the death sentences. The Supreme Court itself used what Justice Alan Handler (a death penalty opponent) called "super due process" and Justice John Wallace labeled "exacting review" - a fusion of the lessons of the 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th amendments. It was this process, not, as some detractors would argue, obstruction, that led to the lack of executions.

Justice Virginia Long felt that the "proportionality review" process used by the courts to be "futile" and wanted to outlaw the death penalty based on "evolving standards of decency". The majority was unpersuaded. Justice Barry Albin agreed with her assessment but believed the court must defer to the voting public, which had affirmed in a 1992 amendment that execution was supported by common sentiment. Indeed, this was the ultimate outcome - the elected Legislature acted and repealed the death penalty on December 17, 2008.

The next day the United Nations General Assembly called for a moratorium on executions. In Italy the Colosseum, ancient site of executions, was bathed n light in tribue

New Jersey, with its urban and diverse population, has long been a bellwether state on social issues such as fair employment practices, and civil union. The death penalty is no exception. 15 months after repeal one state (New Mexico) has followed New Jersey’s lead and has abolished the death penalty.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Symposium proceedings: Legislative Repeal of the Death Penalty in New Jersey

SETON HALL LEGISLATIVE JOURNAL
SYMPOSIUM ISSUE
VOLUME 33, No. 1 (2008)
Constance Desena, Editor In Chief

LEGISLATION, LITIGATION, REFLECTION & REPEAL:
THE LEGISLATIVE REPEAL OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN NEW JERSEY
April 14, 2008 symposium website

Herald of Change? New Jersey’s Repeal of the Death Penalty ... George W. Conk

Proceedings
Call to Order & Welcome
Patrick E. Hobbs, Dean, Seton Hall Law School
George W. Conk, Stein Center for Law & Ethics, Fordham Law School, Symposium Co-Chairman

Keynote Address... James R. Zazzali, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of New Jersey (Ret.)
Symposium Chairman

Panel I: The Struggle in the Courtroom
Moderator: Hon. W. Michael Murphy
Dale Jones, Assistant Public Defender; William A. Zarling, First Deputy Assistant Prosecutor (Ret.); David A. Ruhnke, Esq.

Panel II: The Death Penalty on Appeal
Moderator: Hon. James R. Zazzali, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of New Jersey (Ret.)
Hon. Deborah T. Poritz, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of New Jersey (Ret.)
James K. Smith, Assistant Public Defender
Hon. Alan B. Handler, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of New Jersey (Ret.)
Hon. Peter G. Verniero, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of New Jersey (Ret.)
Lawrence S. Lustberg, Esq., Gibbons P.C.

Address: Hon. Jon S. Corzine, Governor, State of New Jersey

Legislative Resolution presented to Celeste Fitzgerald, New Jerseyans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, by Senator Raymond J. Lesniak

Panel III: Legislative Moratorium and the Death Penalty Study Commission
Moderator: Prof. R. Erik Lillquist, Gibbons Institute, Associate Dean, Seton Hall Law School
Celeste Fitzgerald, Director, New Jerseyans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
Kevin D. Walsh, Esq., New Jerseyans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
Hon. James H. Coleman, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of New Jersey (Ret.)
Miles S. Winder, III, NJ State Bar Association Member of NJ Death Penalty Study Commission


Panel IV: The Final Act - Repeal - Marshaling the Votes
Moderator: Kathy Barrett Carter, Editorial Board member, The Star Ledger
Hon. Robert Martin, Sponsor - NJ State Senate; Professor, Seton Hall Law School, Co-chairman
Hon. Wilfredo Caraballo, N.J. Assembly Sponsor; Professor, Seton Hall Law School
Senator Raymond J. Lesniak, Majority Leader
Hon. Christopher “Kip” Bateman, N.J. Assembly Sponsor

Conference chairs:
Hon. James R. Zazzali, Chairman
Co-chairs:
George Conk - Stein Center for Law & Ethics, Fordham Law School
Robert Martin - Seton Hall Law School
Lynne Newsome - New Jersey State Bar Association
Stephen Greenwald - Capital Punishment committee, New York City Bar Association

Thursday, March 19, 2009

New Mexico follows N.J. in Death Penalty Repeal



The New Mexico Legislature last week voted to replace the death penalty with life impriosnment without parole.  Yesterday Gov. Bill Richardson signed House Bill 285, making New Mexico the second state to repeal the death penalty by vote of elected representatives.  It shows that New Jersey's 2007 repeal earns it the title, as my forthcoming essay declares,  "herald of change".

New Mexico last executed a person in 1960.  State Representative Gail Chasey introduced the measure and led the effort in the legislature.

Troubled by the heavy minority poplation in the state's prisons, and the possibility of error, he nonetheless found the decision difficult.  Richardson explained in his signing statement:

"With my signature, we now have the option of sentencing the worst criminals to life in prison without the possibility of parole. They will never get out of prison. 

Faced with the reality that our system for imposing the death penalty can never be perfect, my conscience compels me to replace the death penalty with a solution that keeps society safe.

The bill I am signing today, which was courageously carried for so many years by Representative Gail Chasey, replaces the death penalty with true life without the possibility of parole – a sentence that ensures violent criminals are locked away from society forever, yet can be undone if an innocent person is wrongfully convicted. More than 130 death row inmates have been exonerated in the past 10 years in this country, including four New Mexicans – a fact I cannot ignore.

From an international human rights perspective, there is no reason the United States should be behind the rest of the world on this issue. Many of the countries that continue to support and use the death penalty are also the most repressive nations in the world. That’s not something to be proud of.

In a society which values individual life and liberty above all else, where justice and not vengeance is the singular guiding principle of our system of criminal law, the potential for wrongful conviction and, God forbid, execution of an innocent person stands as anathema to our very sensibilities as human beings. That is why I’m signing this bill into law."

As in New Jersey the Catholic Church, and citizen activists like the New Mexico Coalition to Repeal the Death Penalty (picture above) made a major contribution.