Friday, May 22, 2026

The Death of the voting rights act?

 https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/16/opinion/voting-rights-act-supreme-court.html?smid=url-share


Thursday, May 14, 2026

Cuba: Waiting in Darkness - Commonweal Magazine

 


Waiting in Darkness

The U.S. fuel blockade against Cuba Commonweal Magazine. May 2026
By Joy Gordon [Professor of Social Ethics, Loyola University - Chicago]

Havana - a city of two million reduced to 1.5 million - is silent.  A few hours of electricity a day is all that survives the U.S. blockade.  Mexico and Venezuela - its principal sources of oil for power production - are blockaded by the order of Donald Trump.
Siege warfare is an ancient device.  Cuba is walled by the sea.  Without access to its trading partners the country - famous for its commitment to education and health care - is reduced to poverty by a siege that is executed without mercy and without escape.  Donald Trump's oil blockade is a quiet act of war that is drowned out by the blockade of Iran.
Joy Gordon reports from Havana on the devastating impact of the blockade, obviously designed to bring about the collapse or overthrow of Cuba's government.  A government which has made food security, housing, health care and education its priorities.  Neither Venezuela nor Mexico is permitted by the Trump government to ship oil to Cuba.  Starvation is the historic consequence of siege.  Cuba is not yet at that point ..but the government - which has long alloted to each family provided rice, beans, cooking oil, coffee, bread, and chicken - is stymied by the blockade.  Hospitals and the elderly are particularly denied necessities.
Relentless anti-communism and the U.S. embargo on trade with Cuba has reduced its population.  The Soviet Union - long a lifeline - is no longer a market for Cuba's exports - largely of sugar.



Monday, May 11, 2026

Scotus Blog: Supreme Court clears Alabama to dissolve a Black-majority Congressional district

Alabama, like Mississippi,  has a notorious history of racial discrimination in voting.  See Morton Stavis, A Century of Struggle For Black Enfranchisement in Mississippi: From the Civil War to the Congressional Challenge of 1965-and Beyond, 57 Miss. L.J. 591, 603 (1987). By 1892, only 68,127 white voters qualified as eligible and a mere 8,615 black voters.  

In Allen v. Caster the Supreme Court has ok'd the dissolution of one of Alabama's two Black majority Congressional districts.  This in a state in which 25% of the electorate is African-American and another 5% Hispanic.

The three Democratic-appointed justices dissented vigorously:

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE KAGAN and JUSTICE JACKSON join, dissenting. 

Today, the Court vacates a District Court order enjoining Alabama’s 2023 Redistricting Plan and remands for reconsideration in light of the Court’s new interpretation of §2 of the Voting Rights Act in Louisiana v. Callais, 608 U. S. ___ (2026). There is no reason to do so. In addition to holding that Alabama’s 2023 Redistricting Plan violates §2, the District Court held, in one of the three cases before this Court, that Alabama violated the Fourteenth Amendment by intentionally diluting the votes of Black voters in Alabama. That constitutional finding of intentional discrimination is independent of, and unaffected by, any of the legal issues discussed in Callais. Vacatur is thus inappropriate and will cause only confusion as Alabamians begin to vote in the elections scheduled for next week. I respectfully dissent.

Scotus Blog: Supreme Court clears Alabama to dissolve a Black-majority Congressional district 

The Supreme Court on Monday afternoon cleared the way for Alabama to use a congressional map that a lower court had blocked on the ground that it violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination in voting. The justices threw out the lower-court order barring Alabama from using the map, which it had adopted in 2023, and sent the dispute back to the lower court for another look. 

Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from Monday’s decision, in a four-page opinion joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. In her view, the court’s order was “inappropriate and will cause only confusion as Alabamians begin to vote in the elections scheduled for next week.”

The dispute began five years ago, when Alabama enacted a new congressional map in the wake of the 2020 census. A group of Black voters and civil rights organizations went to federal court, where they alleged that the new map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, because it spread Black voters in southern Alabama across three congressional districts, leaving them a minority in each.

The district court agreed that the 2021 map likely violated Section 2, and it barred the state from using the map. The Supreme Court upheld that decision in 2023 in Allen v. Milligan.

The Fall of Tom Goldstein - Scotusblog founder


 

Tom Goldstein was not only the founder and EIC of Scotusblog, he was an outstanding Supreme Court practitioner.  But compulsive high stakes gambling has cost him his career, his life with Scotusblog co-editor Amy Howe, and, soon, his freedom. - GWC

Prosecutors Oppose Move To Put Off Goldstein Sentencing

 (May 8, 2026, 3:01 PM EDT) -- Federal prosecutors are claiming that SCOTUSblog founder Thomas Goldstein may have violated his pretrial release conditions when he racked up over $1.7 million in gambling income last year, telling a federal judge not to delay sentencing for the famed U.S. Supreme Court lawyer.

According to a government filing this week, Goldstein — who was convicted on 12 counts of tax evasion, filing false returns, failure to timely pay taxes and mortgage fraud by a federal jury in February — reported the winnings on his 2025 tax return after his six-week trial in Greenbelt, Maryland.

"Those numbers call into question his repeated claims that he could not pay his attorneys, and also his compliance with release conditions barring gambling and engaging in financial transactions without first notifying pretrial services," the U.S. Department of Justice said.

The disclosure also casts a new light on his failure to file personal or law firm returns for tax years 2022, 2023 and 2024, the government said.

"Even if he did not technically mislead the court or violate any conditions, his willingness to file a tax return for a year (2025) when he was barred from gambling only highlights his choice not to file returns for years (2022-2024) when he was still actively gambling," the government told U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby.

Goldstein, who was first indicted in the Eastern District of Maryland in January 2025, had asked the court in the run-up to trial for permission to sell the Washington, D.C., home — valued at over $3 million — that he owned with his wife, saying he needed the money to fund his defense. Judge Griggsby denied that request ahead of trial, but the jury that convicted him on 12 of the government's 16 charges in February found that there wasn't a clear nexus between the property and his mortgage fraud conviction, effectively stopping the government from seizing it.

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Mifepristone

 

https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2026/05/2026-05-01-Fifth-Circuit-Order-Granting-Stay-of-2023-REMS.pdf

Four years after Dobbs Mifepristone again on edge of ban



Certain high risk drugs are subject to REMS - risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. The abortifacient drug Mifepristone has one such drug. But the FDA - during the administration of Joe Biden rejected such a categorization, making the drug widely accessible.

In Louisiana v. FDA the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a nationwide injunction against prescription of Mifepristone, the abortifacient drug.

 See Questions and Answers on Mifepristone for Medical Termination of PregnancyThrough Ten Weeks Gestation, FDA.