United States House of Representatives January 6 Special Committee - Final Report and Supporting Materials
Lawfare - Prosecuting the Insurrectionists
Lawfare Selected Prosecution and Investigation Documents
Anderson v. Griswold 2023 CO 63
U.S. Supreme Court - Oral Argument transcript February 8, 2024
Petition for Certiorari of Donald J. Trump
Anderson v. Trump Docket # 23-719 - Supreme Court of the United States
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Harry Litman - Why the Supreme Court will put Trump back on the ballot, LA Times January 10, 2024
Brian Beutler - Why we can't afford weak-kneed liberalism
Magliocca, Gerard N., Background as Foreground: Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment and January 6th (December 21, 2022). 25 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1059 (2023), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4306094 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4306094
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part One: Why the U.S. Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election Ballot by Marty Lederman, Balkinization - January 2, 2024
Is the President an Officer of the United States?
NO - Prof Seth Barrett Tillman - amicus
Roger Parloff - Lawfare - Scalia said Yes.
Twenty five historians amicus brief - YES
Brief of American Historians in support of Respondents - amici Jill LePore, David Blight, Drew Gilpin Faust, John Fabian Witt
Amicus brief of Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram Amar in support of neither party
Amicus brief in support of respondents by retired Circuit Judge Michael Luttig and nineteen other former high government officials
Old Constitutional Provisions and Presidential Selection: The folly of exhuming Section 3 of the 14th Amendment By Samuel Issacharoff (NYU Law School)
No comments:
Post a Comment