The California State Bar, in response to previous public comments, has announced a revision to its proposed Opinion 13-0002 regarding representation of clients with diminished capacity. The new comment period ends August 24.
Professional Responsibility and Conduct Formal Opinion Interim No. 13-0002THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
STANDING COMMITTEE ON
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONDUCT
FORMAL OPINION INTERIM NO. 13-0002
ISSUES: What are the ethical obligations of a lawyer for a client with diminished
capacity?
DIGEST: A lawyer for a client with diminished capacity should attempt, insofar as
reasonably possible, to preserve a normal attorney-client relationship
with the client, that is, a relationship in which the client makes those
decisions normally reserved to the client. The lawyer’s ethical obligations
to such a client do not change, but the client’s diminished capacity may
require the lawyer to change how the lawyer goes about fulfilling them.
In particular, the duties of competence, communication, loyalty, and
nondiscrimination may require additional measures to ensure that the
client’s decision-making authority is preserved and respected. In
representing such a client, a lawyer must sometimes make difficult
judgments relating to the client’s capacity. Provided that such judgments
are informed and disinterested, they should not lead to professional
discipline.
In some situations, the client’s lack of capacity may require
that the lawyer decline to effectuate the client’s expressed wishes. When
the lawyer reasonably believes that the client’s diminished capacity
exposes the client to harm, the lawyer may seek the client’s informed
consent to take protective measures. If the client cannot or does not give
informed consent, the lawyer may be unable to protect the client against
harm. A lawyer representing a competent client who may later become
incapacitated may propose to the client that the client give advanced
consent to protective disclosure in the event that such incapacity occurs.
If appropriately limited and informed, such a consent is ethically proper.
AUTHORITIES
INTERPRETED: Rules of Professional Conduct 1.0.1(e), 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.7, and 8.4.1 of
the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California.1
Business and Professions Code section 6068(e)
No comments:
Post a Comment