This is the kind of thing the SCOTUS would uphold 5-4.
Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh - YES it is facially neutral, intent to discriminate not shown
Sotomayor, Ginsburg, NO - intent can be inferred from the obvious differential impactKagan, Breyer - NO - government is obligated to find reasonable alternatives and such efforts have not been shown. - gwc
Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh - YES it is facially neutral, intent to discriminate not shown
Sotomayor, Ginsburg, NO - intent can be inferred from the obvious differential impactKagan, Breyer - NO - government is obligated to find reasonable alternatives and such efforts have not been shown. - gwc
This is the most important piece of reporting I've read today.— Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) August 22, 2018
The Trump administration's hunting for polling places in minority areas without wheelchair ramps -- then trying to get those polling places shut down under the Americans with Disabilities Acthttps://t.co/lHHkASnqHl
No comments:
Post a Comment