Saturday, September 15, 2018

Police order San Jose Catholic Worker to vacate tents for homeless

Image result for san jose hope village
San Jose Mercury News
Peter Conk speaking at Hope Village rally
My brother Peter started San Jose Catholic Worker 45 years ago.  He is still dedicated to easing the plight of the poorest among us.  SJ Catholic Worker is in so-called silicon valley twere are thousands of homeless sleep in tents along highways and under bridges.  San Jose regularly confiscates their stuff.  SJ Catholic Worker ministers to them through programs like their Showers for the People van which provides showers and clean clothes to homeless men and women.

Peter and his allies have been pushing the City to change.  They have now established a model tent encampment for half a dozen people in hope of igniting support for their plan for a larger tent shelter camp.
The California Highway Patrol has ordered them to leave by 8 AM Monday morning.  They will defy that order and are rallying supporters

You can reach them at  andrew@sjcw.org 

Thursday, September 13, 2018

Tish James: "Thank you for voting, for standing up for Democracy and speaking truth to power today, New York. Never lose your voice at the polls.… https://t.co/LbfxXyYW2m"

Tish James
Letitia James - New York City Public Advocate- will be the first Black woman to hold state-wide office in New York.  Brooklyn born, a former public defender, City Council member, and Assistant Attorney General she will be an important voice against the Trump GOP.  

Zephyr Teachout is an eloquent dissenter but lacks James's experience.  I am very pleased that we have a CUNY grad (Lehman College) and advocate, Howard University Law School graduate, with broad experience and deep New York roots at the helm in the New York AG's office which has twice been disgraced in recent years. - gwc

Tish James on Twitter: "Thank you for voting, for standing up for Democracy and speaking truth to power today, New York. Never lose your voice at the polls.… https://t.co/LbfxXyYW2m"
NYC   - LEADER
 James
 Teachout
 Maloney
COUNTYJAMESTEACHOUTMALONEYRPT.
Brooklyn
154,687
86,679
33,729
98%
Manhattan
81,064
99,099
39,621
99
Queens
95,673
36,064
36,812
99
Bronx
72,970
11,443
22,941
94
Erie
9,711
18,968
30,760
98

Tuesday, September 11, 2018

The left must restore the ties between antisemitism and other racism | Rachel Shabi | Opinion | The Guardian

The left must restore the ties between antisemitism and other racism | Rachel Shabi | Opinion | The Guardian


Jewish new year is a time for reflection, and the subject of Labour and antisemitism inevitably featured on the list of things to think about this year. Indeed, it was hard to avoid, for on the eve of Rosh Hashanah, the Labour MP Chuka Umunna proclaimed his party to be “institutionally racist” over antisemitism. Folded into this row is a painful aspect of the story: that elements of the left, for whom fighting racism is a deeply held principle, might overlook, underplay or even reproduce this ancient race-hate against Jewish people.
The issue has coalesced around the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, and his supporters. But in truth, it is nothing new. Published in the early 1980s, Jewish socialist Steve Cohen’s book That’s Funny, You Don’t Look Antisemitic, still resonates today. He wrote: “It is intolerable that the socialist movement has never been prepared to look at its antisemitism in a self-critical way.”
Leftwing antisemitism can arise from common misconceptions, such as coding all Jewish people (including those, like me, from an Arab-Jewish background) as white – in both political and status terms. Racism as an imagined white superiority over people of colour underpins current discrimination and appalling historical injustices such as colonialism and slavery, which continue to cause terrible harm today. By contrast, a core antisemitic trope is the Jewish conspiracy of a shadowy all-powerful group controlling the world, or at least the media – based on an imagined superior status of Jews. Perceptions of Jewish people as “white” can also mask their persecution as a racialised minority. Jews were long hated as the “other”, the Orientals of Europe, in language of a type deployed to demonise Arab and Muslim populations today.
Meanwhile, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has driven a wedge between battles against racism and antisemitism. The Oxford philosopher Brian Klug locates the genesis of this divide in a 1975 UN general assembly resolution asserting that Zionism, alongside colonialism and foreign occupation “is a form of racism and racial discrimination”. This, Klug argues, “erased the origins of Zionism in the Jewish historical experience of exclusion, expulsion and racial discrimination”. Eventually dropped, the resolution, he says, had a lasting effect on the left – diminishing the idea that, as well as being experienced as colonial racial discrimination by Palestinians, Zionism was also a national movement born of oppression and trauma. Cohen sums up this duality by describing Zionism as both racist and anti-racist – the latter because it was an answer to the murderous anti-Jewish racism of Europe.

Monday, September 10, 2018

Oregon Bar Dues Challenged on First Amendment Grounds

Related imageRelated image
In Janus v. American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees in a 5 -4 vote the United States Supreme Court struck an Illinois law requiring public employees represented by an AFSCME local to pay "agency fees" to the union for its representation which protected the interests of all bargaining unit members.  The majority rejected that argument - holding that union advocacy on matters such as state budgets was political speech which the objecting members could not be compelled to "subsidize".

Now two Oregon lawyers are objecting to the fees charged by the Oregon State Bar to which they are obligated by statute to contribute.  In their complaint Diane Gruber and Mark Reynolds object to a statement by the State Bar denouncing "White nationalism".  I would vote for that statement every day if it were offered before the voluntary New Jersey State Bar Association of which I have been an active member for thirty years.  But the Oregon State Bar is not a voluntary organization for lawyers who want to practice in the State.  So though Gruber and Reynolds may have ideological views I find abominable, they do seem to have grounds for their complaint relying on Janus. - gwc




Lodestar rising? Calif. federal judges are opting for lodestar awards in megacases | Reuters

Lodestar rising? Calif. federal judges are opting for lodestar awards in megacases | Reuters
by Alison Frankel
(Reuters) - It’s always notable when a federal judge presiding over a big class action slashes a fee request by millions of dollars - but I think there’s another story lurking beneath the dollar signs in an opinion issued Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh of San Jose.
Three plaintiffs' firms that obtained nearly $170 million for artists and engineers whose job prospects suffered under an alleged no-poaching agreement among animation studios asked Judge Koh to award them $31.5 million for squeezing a $150 million settlement from Disney and Dreamworks. The judge instead granted them $13.8 million. She previously awarded $4.7 million in fees for a smaller classwide settlement, bringing the total fees for plaintiffs' lawyers from Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro and Susman Godfrey to about $18.5 million.
Notably, Judge Koh’s award was based not on the recovery the firms won for class members but on their hourly billings. The firms wanted the judge to grant them 21 percent of the class recovery, which, they argued, is less than the 25 percent benchmark established by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. Judge Koh, however, applied the alternative lodestar approach.

Sunday, September 9, 2018

Tom Nichols: The jig is up - NeverTrumpers win

Image result for emperors new clothes
Tom Nichols, an historian at the Naval War College (Newport, RI some guys have all the luck), is a NeverTrumper who has stuck to his guns.
In this thread  [READ IT!] Nichols demonstrates that the NeverTrumpers have been proven right.  This past week's events: Woodward's FEAR, and the Anonymous (anominous) Op-Ed establish Trump's unfitness beyond cavil.
We know too that the only collusion question is how far did it extend, and what further corruption will be exposed (a lot).  And how does it all end.  As Bob Woodward Said today:  "People better wake up to what's going on".

In closing I will quote our Dear Leader who tweeted this morning:
Thank you To Chairman Kim. We will both prove everyone wrong! There is nothing like good dialogue from two people that like each other! Much better than before I took office.

Nichols is clear: only throwing the bums out can save the Republican party from its cult of personality debacle.



Brett Kavanaugh said he would kill Roe v. Wade last week and almost no one noticed – ThinkProgress

Image result for susan collins brett kavanaugh
AP photo
Brett Kavanaugh said he would kill Roe v. Wade last week and almost no one noticed – ThinkProgress
by Ian Millhiser

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh needs to give Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) plausible deniability regarding his anti-abortion views. Collins, who is nominally pro-choice, said shortly before Kavanaugh’s nomination that a Supreme Court nominee “who would overturn Roe v. Wade would not be acceptable to me.” But she’s spent much of the time since his nomination looking for excuses to claim that Kavanaugh’s views on Roe are uncertain.
Well, they aren’t. Even before Kavanaugh became a Supreme Court nominee, his record indicated fairly clearly that he opposes Roe. And he cleared up any remaining doubt on the second day of his confirmation hearing — despite the fact that almost no one noticed....KEEP READING

Saturday, September 8, 2018

NAACP LDF -Report on Brett Kavanaugh

Image result for thurgood marshall supreme court steps
The Legal Defense Fund - the public interest law firm historically associated with the NAACP and its landmark Brown v. Board of Education, has reviewed the record of Brett Kavanaugh and concluded he is unfit to serve on the United States Supreme Court.
FINAL_Report on Brett Kavanaugh_FINAL_11_22.pdf
The nomination of Judge Kavanaugh to be a justice on the Supreme Court comes at a unique and unprecedented moment in our country’s history. Our review of Judge Kavanaugh’s record grapples with the judicial philosophies he holds and the rulings he has issued. It also reflects the highly unusual context surrounding his nomination. His record on and off the court independently shapes our assessment of his fitness to serve on the nation’s highest court and our evaluation of the likely effect he would have on the Court’s jurisprudence concerning fundamental civil rights and protections. Together, this record and the fraught context of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination cement our position that he is unfit to serve as the next justice of the Supreme Court.  

New translations - Internet cases and e-commerce law

Friday, September 7, 2018

Letitia James for NY Attorney General

Tish JamesImage result for letitia james


It's time to decide for primary voters in New York.  Zephyr Teachout, a law professor at Fordham, has gained the Times endorsement and hopes that her anti-corruption theme will carry her to the Attorney General's office.  Consumed by the corruption of the Trump regime, and the many prosecutions of New York state politicians as we have been, her appeal is strong.
But we have to decide what kind of lawyer we want for Attorney General.  Tish James  can back up her claim to be The People's Lawyer,  Born in Brooklyn she has been a public defender, Brooklyn regional manager for the New York State Attorney General, a City Council member, and Public Advocate for New York City.  She has a broad agenda of protection of workers, consumers, children, and parents.
Zephyr Teachout's experience is far narrower, her ties to New York thin.
Letitia James, endorsed by the New York State Democratic Party, would bring a depth of commitment to the legal issues most important to the people of the State.
TishJames2018
Primarily New York: Letitia James for NY Attorney General | The Brian Lehrer Show | WNYC

Labor Unions Back James

President Obama speaks at University of Illinois

The audio/video starts at 25:00.
The introduction by a student is excellent.
FULL TEXT

Dorf on Law: Settled Law, Precedent on Precedent, and Abortion: What We Learned and Didn't Learn About Judge Kavanaugh's Views on Abortion

Dorf on Law: Settled Law, Precedent on Precedent, and Abortion: What We Learned and Didn't Learn About Judge Kavanaugh's Views on Abortion
by Michael C. Dorf

Accordingly, I think the most generous way to read Kavanaugh is as having been misleading albeit not downright dishonest in saying he now sees Roe as "settled law." In his own mind in 2003, "settled law" meant law that is not at all likely to be overruled; he had reason to think that Maine Senator Susan Collins would take him to be saying that about Roe now when he called it settled law; and yet, even though he didn't like the use of the term "settled law" to mean law that is only settled until the Supreme Court unsettles it, that was the definition he secretly had in mind when he used the term to describe Roe to Senator Collins. If so, I guess that's not technically a lie, but it's hardly the whole truth.

Not since The Gettysburg Address.....

Image result for gettysburg cemetery




By Garry Wills. Illustrated. 317 pp. New York: Simon & Schuster. $23. 

"THE world will little note, nor long remember what we say here. . . ."

by William McFeely
Garry Wills has taken note, remembered and given our nation's greatest gathering of words, the Gettysburg Address, new urgency. It has been more than tenscore years since Thomas Jefferson held it to be self-evident that all men are created equal; more than sixscore since Abraham Lincoln committed this nation to that proposition. In 1992, Mr. Wills, despite the dismaying evidence that the proposition is still dishonored, has written a brilliant book demonstrating that Lincoln's words still have power.
This scholarly study of oratory begins with the stink of rotting corpses. When the two great battered armies moved away from Gettysburg in July 1863, they left behind thousands of bodies of horses and men decaying in the summer sun. David Wills, the town's leading citizen, arranged for the animals to be dragged into piles and burned, and, after considerable negotiation, he found workers to bury the men hastily in temporary graves. The reburial of the Union dead was still under way on Nov. 19, when Lincoln delivered his address; Garry Wills has not forgotten that it was a cemetery that Edward Everett and Abraham Lincoln had been invited to dedicate.

Thursday, September 6, 2018

John Roberts and the Second Redemption Court - The Atlantic

Image result for colfax massacre
John Roberts and the Second Redemption Court - The Atlantic
by Adam Serwer

Adam Serwer has a new piece in the Atlantic that tells the story of the post-civil war cases betraying the promise of the 14th Amendment and of Emancipation.   He leads into the Roberts court as the Second Redemption Court (as in southern "Redeemers" of lost white power).  The eye catcher for me is that Serwer begins with the Colfax Massacre in Louisiana on Easter Sunday in 1873.   The Supreme Court vacated murder convictions by the white militiamen.  It gutted federal protections by the insertion of  the intent requirement and limited the 14th Amendment​ to state action in the 1874 and 1875 Cruikshank cases.  That fact is  concisely stated by Serwer in the excerpt below.  We live with the heritage of that betrayal f the promise of Reconstruction.

In the first of the Cruikshank cases  New Jersey railroad lawyer and Justice Joseph Bradley found that the 14th Amendment did not empower the federal government to prosecute the white militiamen who murdered the defenders of the elected local government.  Such private discrimination - if that was what it was - was a matter for the states.   Bradley's ruling reversing convictions of a handful of the murders  was upheld two years later by the full Supreme Court. Since then the states were free to ignore the racist depredations committed within their borders. This approach was first brought to my attention by James Pope's Snubbed Landmark and Martha McCluskey's Facing the Ghost .

- GWC
​Serwer:
 
​
​ Seventy-two men were ultimately indicted for their role in the Colfax massacre, charged under the Enforcement Acts of 1870, which were passed to help the federal government suppress the Ku Klux Klan. But their convictions were overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, which concluded that the federal government lacked the authority to charge the perpetrators. Justice Joseph Bradley, a Grant appointee, wrote that the United States had not clearly stated that the accused, in slaughtering more than 100 black men, had “committed the acts complained of with a design to deprive the injured persons of their rights on account of their race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” And it wouldn’t have mattered if they had, argued the Grant-appointed Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite, because the Fourteenth Amendment’s powers did not cover discrimination by individuals, only by the state. “The only obligation resting upon the United States is to see that the States do not deny the right,” Waite wrote. “This the amendment guarantees, but no more. The power of the national government is limited to the enforcement of this guaranty.” ​

Kavanaugh - In (dis)respect of precedent - Mark Joseph Stern - Slate

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/kavanaugh-confirmation-hearing-roe-heller.html
The Precedent Respecter Has Logged On

Brett Kavanaugh says he follows every Supreme Court precedent. Don’t believe him.By 

Here’s How Brett Kavanaugh Would Push SCOTUS to the Right | Brennan Center for Justice

Here’s How Brett Kavanaugh Would Push SCOTUS to the Right | Brennan Center for Justice
Since his nomination by President Trump in July, both supporters and opponents of Judge Brett Kavanaugh have largely agreed that he’s likely to push the Supreme Court to the right.
It’s worth remembering that Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose seat Kavanaugh would fill, sided with the court’s conservatives far more often than not. So on plenty issues, replacing Kennedy with Kavanaugh likely won’t dramatically shift the court’s jurisprudence.
Still, a close look at the records of both men reveals certain areas — several of them core issues of democracy and the rule of law, as well as reducing gun violence and preserving access to abortion — where the change is likely to have important, even in some cases transformative, effects. The result, if Kavanaugh is confirmed, could well be a court that makes it easier to get a gun and harder to get an abortion, that aids Trump’s efforts to stonewall the Mueller investigation, and that further exacerbates the influence of big money and partisan manipulation in our elections.

Wednesday, September 5, 2018

New York’s Schools Chancellor Is Talking About Integration. Can He Make It Happen? - The New York Times

New York’s Schools Chancellor Is Talking About Integration. Can He Make It Happen? - The New York Times
by Dana Goldstein

Richard Carranza is eager to talk about segregation.
New York’s new schools chancellor wants to talk about how the nation’s largest school system is clustering the poorest children (mostly black and brown) in one set of classrooms, and the richest children (mostly white) in another set — and failing to live up to its progressive ideals.
He wants to talk about how school zones contribute to segregation and whether “gifted and talented” classes, where white and Asian students tend to cluster, ought to exist.
He says his ideas go further than finding ways to admit more black and Hispanic students to the city’s most elite high schools, a proposal he and Mayor Bill de Blasio unveiled in June.
But, as the first full school year of Mr. Carranza’s tenure begins, the question is whether he will venture beyond what he calls “a values conversation” to effect large-scale citywide change

Opinion | I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration - The New York Times


President Trump is amoral, writes a senior White House aide.

Now begins the real witch hunt - who wrote it?
Damn Jeff Sessions should go after the failing New York Times!
Opinion | I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration - The New York Times

President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.
It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.
The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
ADVERTISEMENT
I would know. I am one of them.
To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.
But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.

Tuesday, September 4, 2018

Polluters now have to pay cleanup costs - USA - Chinadaily.com.cn


Taizhu Intermediate People's Court, Jiangsu Province
Polluters now have to pay cleanup costs - USA - Chinadaily.com.cn

TWO SENIOR EXECUTIVES of a polluting enterprise in Jinzhou, North China's Hebei province, were recently sentenced to prison and ordered to pay 1.08 million yuan ($158,100) in compensation to the local environmental protection bureau to cover the cleanup costs. Beijing News comments:

Not long before, the Jiangsu provincial court had sentenced a polluting enterprise in Taizhou, Jiangsu province, and ordered it to pay the local government 55.14 million yuan for ecological and environmental restoration.
The two trials show the previous practice of local governments covering the cost of pollution will be history from now on.
That polluters pay the cost of environmental and ecological restoration is perfectly justified, and will relieve the governments, if not taxpayers, of the heavy financial burden of cleaning up the mess caused by polluters.
As the plaintiffs, the local procuratorates have played an important role in winning the two cases, as they are much more professional and experienced in collecting evidence and presenting it to the court than individual citizens or social organizations.

Attack on NBC - another impeachable offense





Monday, September 3, 2018

NPCSC Adopts E-Commerce Law, Soil Pollution Prevention and Control Law & Amends Individual Income Tax Law – NPC Observer

NPCSC Adopts E-Commerce Law, Soil Pollution Prevention and Control Law & Amends Individual Income Tax Law – NPC Observer

The 13th NPC Standing Committee (NPCSC) concluded its fifth session last Friday and adopted the E-Commerce Law, the Soil Pollution Prevention and Control Law, and an amendment to the Individual Income Tax Law. All three laws will take effect on January 1, 2019. Due to competing offline commitments, we are able to discuss only two laws in relative detail below.

The E-Commerce Law [电子商务法] includes seven chapters with a total of 89 articles. “E-commerce” as defined and regulated by the Law refers to domestic “business activities that sell merchandise or provide services on information networks such as the internet” (art. 2, para. 2). Expressly excluded from the purview of the Law are “financial products and services, as well as services that use information networks to provide such content as news information, audio-visual programs, publications, and cultural products” (id. para. 3). “E-commerce operators” [电子商务经营者], or individuals and organizations that engage in e-commerce, are either “e-commerce platform operators” (like Taobao), “intra-platform operators” (like vendors on Taobao), and other e-commerce operators (for example, people who do business on WeChat) (art. 9).

The Law gives special attention to the duties and obligations of e-commerce operators. They are generally required to register with market regulatory authorities, except those exempted by statute or regulations and (among others) those who engage in “small sporadic transactions” [零星小额交易] (art. 10). They must also comply with various disclosure requirements on, for example, their licenses and merchandise- or services-related information (see arts. 15–17). In addition, among other prohibitions, e-commerce operators must not fabricate reviews to deceive or mislead consumers (art. 17); must not show consumers targeted ads without also showing them non-targeted ads (art. 18); and must not make tied [搭售] merchandise or services selected by default (art. 19).
Given the dominant role e-commerce platform operators play in China, the Law devotes an entire section to their specific duties and obligations (see Ch. 2, sec. 2). They are required to assist with real-name registrations of intra-platform operators (see art. 28), to ensure cybersecurity (see art. 30), to guard the safety of the person and property of consumers (see art. 38), and to protect intellectual property (see arts. 41–45), among others responsibilities. In particular, platform operators are subject to joint and several liability for certain torts committed by intra-platform operators, such as consumer rights or intellectual property infringement, if they “know or should have known of” the infringement but have failed to take necessary actions (see arts. 38, 42, 45). The failure to act additionally exposes platform operators to hefty fines of up to two million yuan (see arts. 83–84).

The Law supplements existing laws like the Contracts Law [合同法] and the Electronic Signatures Law [电子签名法] with special rules for the conclusion and fulfillment of e-commerce contracts (see Ch. 3). It also includes two other chapters on e-commerce dispute resolution and e-commerce promotion, respectively (see Chs. 4–5). The Law is being translated at China Law Translate.

“Dying to Survive” and Pharmaceutical IP Reform in China | China IPR - Intellectual Property Developments in China

“Dying to Survive” and Pharmaceutical IP Reform in China | China IPR - Intellectual Property Developments in China
by Mark Cohen

Last week while in Beijing, I finally had the opportunity to see “Dying to Survive” (Chinese title: “我不是药神”[translation: I am not the god of medicines]), the hit Chinese movie which concerns the problem of high priced cancer medicines that were not available through insurance on the Chinese market and had also been subject to patent validity and infringement disputes. The screening I saw was filmed in Mandarin and subtitled in English. When it opened in China, the movie was the second highest grossing movie in the world, and it is now on track to gross over 3 billion RMB.
***
The movie is based on an actual incident involving an individual named Lu Yong 陆勇. The movie also bears some similarity to Dallas Buyers Club, which involved distribution of AIDS medication in the United States. In real life, generic forms of Gleevec were approved by Chinese regulatory authorities in 2013. The product was also placed into the Chinese insurance reimbursement list in 2017.

The official and public reactions to the film suggest that China is indeed dedicated to both pharmaceutical IP and regulatory reform. Premier Li Keqiang cited the movie in encouraging accelerated new product introduction and lower drug prices. A translation by the Anjie law firm of an article by IPHouse on a screening of the film with leading judges, academics and lawyers is attached. Based on this article and meetings I held in China, I believe that most people thought that the movie’s message was that China needs to continue to engage in a range of legal reforms, including: accelerating approval of new drugs by China’s National Drug Administration; improving IP protection to encourage innovative drug development; and providing insurance to cover treatments.

Saturday, September 1, 2018

Archbishop Romero, martyr, to be made saint at Vatican ceremony Oct. 14 | National Catholic Reporter




Archbishop Romero, martyr, to be made saint at Vatican ceremony Oct. 14 | National Catholic Reporter
by Joshua McElwee

VATICAN CITY — After a 38-year-wait, it is now official. Salvadoran Archbishop Oscar Romero, murdered in 1980 for speaking out against military oppression, will be made a saint of the Roman Catholic Church at a Vatican ceremony Oct. 14.
Pope Francis, the first pontiff from the Americas, announced the decision May 19 during a meeting with cardinals based in Rome.
Romero, long considered a saint by Catholics across the Americas, will be elevated to universal veneration at the Vatican ceremony alongside Pope Paul VI, the pontiff who first appointed him a bishop and made the fateful decision in 1977 to make him archbishop of San Salvador.
Four others -- two Italian priests and German and Spanish founders of separate women’s religious orders -- will also be made saints at the ceremony.
The Salvadoran's canonization, while expected in recent months, nonetheless represents the culmination of one of the clearest turnabouts of Francis' nearly five-year papacy.
The cause for Romero had languished for decades under Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI, who expressed unease with his connection to liberation theology and his vocal denunciations of government killings and kidnappings.
Less than two years after his election as pontiff, Francis placed Romero firmly on the sainthood track, formally decreeing in February 2015 that the archbishop was assassinated as a martyr for the Catholic faith. He then authorized his beatification, the last step before sainthood, in May of that year.
El Salvador's ambassador to the U.K., Elisabeth Hayek-Weinmann, told NCR that Romero's coming sainthood "represents a unique opportunity" for the country "to heal our historical wounds, restore our social fabric and build a new sense of national identity based on common values, with social justice and respect for human dignity at its core."
"His teachings and legacy provides us, as a nation, a strong moral compass," said Hayek-Weinmann.
Support 

5 MB IBM hard drive 1956




Barack Obama's Eulogy for John McCain: Full Text - The Atlantic

Image result for mccain casket capitol rotunda
Barack Obama's Eulogy for John McCain: Full Text - The Atlantic

“Today is only one day in all the days that will ever be. But what will happen in all the other days that will ever come can depend on what you do today.” What better way to honor John McCain's life of service than, as best we can, follow his example. To prove that the willingness to get in the arena and fight for this country is not reserved for the few, it is open to all of us, and in fact it is demanded of all of us as citizens of this great republic. That's perhaps how we honor him best, by recognizing that there are some things bigger than party or ambition or money or fame or power. That there are some things that are worth risking everything for: principles that are eternal, truths that are abiding. At his best, John showed us what that means. For that, we are all deeply in his debt. May God bless John McCain. May God bless this country he served so well.