Thursday, March 27, 2014

Supreme Court Oral Argument Shows How Religious Freedom Claims Have Become Ideologically Charged | Michael C. Dorf | Verdict | Legal Analysis and Commentary from Justia

Liberals and conservatives have switched sides on the religious freedom debate, Cornell law prof Michael Dorf argues.  Liberals used to argue for the primacy of conscience (think loyalty oaths), and conservatives the opposite (national security trumps all).  But now liberals are pro-equality and conservatives pro-freedom.  More evidence that experience, not logic is the life of the law?
 - gwc
Torts Today: Supreme Court Oral Argument Shows How Religious Freedom Claims Have Become Ideologically Charged | Michael C. Dorf | Verdict | Legal Analysis and Commentary from Justia:

'via Blog this'

No comments:

Post a Comment