Saturday, February 28, 2026

Scahill: Netanyahu demands Hamas disarm, Hamas refuses



 https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/trump-netanyahu-demands-hamas-disarmament-gaza-board-peace-negotiations-mladenov

As President Donald Trump prepares to convene the first official meeting of his speciously named Board of Peace on Thursday, he and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have re-escalated demands that Hamas and other Palestinian resistance factions imminently disarm—with Netanyahu insisting that all small arms must be turned over before the Israeli military withdraws any of its forces.

“Very importantly, Hamas must uphold its commitment to Full and Immediate Demilitarization,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social on Sunday.

This demand is being presented as a condition for any reconstruction to begin in Gaza, with no guarantees for Palestinian security or sovereignty. A senior Israeli official also claimed Monday that Trump is considering imposing a two-month deadline for Palestinians to surrender their weapons. Both Trump and Netanyahu have threatened that a large-scale war against Gaza could resume if Hamas refuses to capitulate.

Meanwhile Hamas has not been part of any formal negotiations for several months. Amid media reports of new drafts and U.S. preparation for negotiations, Hamas leaders say there has been nothing formally presented to the movement and that no official meetings have been held with the group to discuss possible scenarios.

Wednesday, February 25, 2026

RIP Jerome Cohen - by Martin Flaherty




 Jerome Cohen, the late lawyer and NYU Law Professor was our leading

"China hand".  He was an advocate for democracy in China while maintaining the ability to be heard in China.

I am grateul for his inviting me to join him and Judges John Walker and Jed Rakoff in China fifteen years ago.

Here Fordham and Princeton Professor Martin Flaherty offers his own reflections and tribute:

On the Legacy of Jerry Cohen
 
Jerry Cohen, who died earlier this month, did Thomas More one better.  More may have been a “Man for All Seasons.”  Jerry, as befits the title of his recent and compelling memoir, Eastward, Westward, was a Man for All Regions – more specifically, a man who more than any other united the East and West.  As many have noted, he was founder, father, and doyenne of the study of Chinese law outside – and in many ways, inside -- China.  As many have noted has well, he was very much more.  Not least, he drew in, and supported, countless people who otherwise would not have been much involved in the rule of law and China.  I was very fortunate to be one of them, and for that reason, so too have over a generation of my students at Princeton.
 
       Jerry taught me profound lessons starting from the first time I became aware of him.  Yet my first impression could not have been worse.  I had just been involved in a human rights mission to Hong Kong just after its handover back to Chinese sovereignty.  Not long after, the mainland government essentially overruled Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal concerning the right to abode under the new Basic Law designed to entrench the policy of “One Country, Two Systems.” This “[re]-interpretation” stoked fears that Hong Kong’s autonomy would be dead on arrival (rather than dead in 2020 with the National Security Law).  Most human rights advocates and NGOs steadfastly supported the stand of the Hong Kong Judiciary.  Yet Jerry argued that the Court of Final Appeal would have been wiser to issue a less bold ruling, the better to consolidate its position.  At the time, I thought this Professor Cohen was one of those typica “China hands” who never missed the chance to err on the side of Beijing.  I could not have been more wrong.  One lesson I learned was that Professor Cohen was probably right and usually was.  Another was that there was no more steadfast champion of the rule of law and human rights in China than Jerry Cohen. 
 
Jerry taught these lessons in countless ways to multiple audiences.  To specialists, his scholarship could not be anything other than essential since he more or less invented the study of modern Chinese law in the United States.  Then there was his courageous championing of an array of Chinese lawyers, scholars, and activists, themselves courageous, who risked their careers and freedom in the cause of fulfilling the promise of a reconstructed Chinese legal system.
 
      But for me, no less contribution was sustaining those concerned for the rule of law in general as it applied to the world’s largest state.  General human rights advocates benefited from a lifelong crash course through NYU’s US-ALI programs, Jerry’s regular column in the South China Morning Post, and his unparalleled Winston Lord Roundtable sessions on China at the Council on Foreign Relations, an institution not known for prioritizing international human rights law (as witness its Henry Kissinger fellowships).  Not for Jerry was the exclusivity speaking only to a closed group of specialists and Mandarin speakers.  So long as one cared about promoting basic legal standards of equity and fairness, Jerry was instantly your mentor.
 
Among the innumerable mentees were my students.  For over 20 years I’ve taught an ungraduated policy task force at Princeton’s School of Public and International Affairs devoted to the rule of law in China.  For the first decade, the goal was promoting the idea in China; for the last ten years it has pivoted to defending the concepts from assaults by China.  Either way, the project would culminate at the State Department and White House.  But the real highlight of the course was our “dress rehearsal” at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York hosted by Jerry and China experts he assembled.  There my students got a master class on all aspects of the topic.  Among other things, they saw a man in his 80s, then 90s, going on 30.  They also experienced Jerry’s rigorous courtliness and generosity.  Most of all they appreciated how his disappointment with the regime’s turn away from law translated not into despair or cynicism.  Rather, they saw that frustration turn into a renewed commitment to promoting fundamental fairness through law everywhere, including what has arguably become the most consequential country on the planet.
 
Given the countless persons Jerry has influenced in every region, it is a commitment that will live on.  From all of us, Jerry, Xie Xie.


Martin S. Flaherty
Charles and Marie Robertson Visiting Professor
School of Public and International Affairs

Sunday, February 8, 2026

COLD by Mary Oliver

I think of summer with its luminous fruit,

blossoms rounding to berries, leaves,

handfuls of grain.

Maybe what cold is, is the time

we measure the love we have always had, secretly,

for our own bones, the hard knife-edged love

for the warm river of the I, beyond all else; maybe

that is what it means the beauty

 of the blue shark cruising toward the tumbling seals.

In the season of snow,

in the immeasurable cold,

we grow cruel but honest; we keep

ourselves alive,

if we can, taking one after another

the necessary bodies of others, the many

crushed red flowers.

—Mary Oliver, “Cold”

Monday, February 2, 2026

The Crisis - Thomas Paine 1776



250 years ago!

 These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. 

Thomas Paine The Crisis, December 23 1776

 

Sunday, February 1, 2026

Josh Marshall - Corrupt, fascistic Supreme Court - Talking Points Memo



 Reality Distortion in the Age of Trump and the Corrupt Court

With a hearing on the constitutionality of birthright citizenship now on the calendar, I want to return to a basic point we’ve discussed several times over the last year. Given our experience living mostly in “normal” times, many of us are used to the idea that the law evolves over time. When judges create new case law, the law evolves and changes. And we accept that it has “changed” — in a certain meaning of the word — even when we may not agree with the change. But with so many other things that have changed slowly since 2016 and then rapidly from early 2025, these are outdated ideas, outdated understandings of how the world and the law works.

Birthright citizenship is a key example of this.

Birthright citizenship is clearly, explicitly and incontestably written into the U.S. Constitution. It’s the country’s fundamental law and more than 150 years of American history have been lived on that basis. There’s a reason why no one has doubted this over all those years even if many have opposed it.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/reality-distortion-in-the-age-of-trump-and-the-corrupt-court