Monday, March 21, 2016

The Court Fight Is About Democracy | E.J. Dionne WAPO // RealClearPolitics

The Court Fight Is About Democracy | RealClearPolitics
By E.J. Dionne
March 21, 2016

WASHINGTON -- There's a reason beyond garden-variety partisanship that Senate Republicans resist even holding hearings on President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. Their gambit evades a full and open debate over the conservative judicial agenda, which is to use the high court in an aggressive and political way to reverse decades of progressive legislation.

The central irony here: The very conservatives who use "judicial activism" as a battering ram against liberals are now the aggressive judicial activists. It's precisely because Garland's record reveals him to be a devout practitioner of judicial restraint that an intellectually frank dialogue over his nomination would be so dangerous to the right. It would expose the radicalism of their jurisprudence.

No comments:

Post a Comment