Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Today's Oral Argument in Hobby Lobby - Nelson Tebbe - Balkinization

Updated to include transcript
Balkinization: Today's Oral Argument in Hobby Lobby: by Prof. Nelson Tebbe //Brooklyn Law School
" The oral argument in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood, which I attended today, provided some slight cause for optimism for those of us who have been arguing that accommodating the companies would raise serious concerns because it would mean shifting the cost of that accommodation onto third parties (the affected women employees). Not only did Solicitor General Verrilli open and close with the argument, but Justice Kennedy arguably displayed some sympathy for the point. First, Justice Kennedy asked Paul Clement (who was arguing for the companies) whether there are rules of statutory construction that should guide the Court in this case, such as the canon of constitutional avoidance. Later, Justice Kennedy asked directly what should happen when granting an accommodation for the companies would shift costs onto employees. Justice Kennedy asked whether the employer's interests should simply trump in such situations...."

'via Blog this'

No comments:

Post a Comment